Research tool

PAS Schemes Monitor

Comparing how England, the Netherlands, and Denmark track archaeological finds made by the public — with live data from the Portable Antiquities Scheme.

Live · PAS UK PAN & DIME · boundaries only Updates automatically
Total Records
Bronze Age
Iron Age
Published
Awaiting Validation

1300–700 BC · live from finds.org.uk

About this project

Comparing how nations track public finds

Professional archaeology doesn't have a monopoly on finding the past. Across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, metal detectorists and other members of the public report their discoveries to the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) — a voluntary programme run by the British Museum that, for the first time, gave this activity real numbers. The Netherlands followed with PAN, Denmark with DIME, and Finland with SuALT. This project compares them.

Most of what these programmes find never reaches academic archaeology. PAS exists to change that — crowdsourcing find locations and object types into a public database, while keeping exact findspots confidential. It's as much a pedagogical project as a research one, and not without its critics; the Annual Reports and the literature below cover that debate in more depth.

I started with PAS data on Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age finds — the period I worked on for my MA thesis — because I already know the material. The map below shows finds by English county, drawn live from the PAS API. I now have access to PAN's Dutch data as well, but their public interface doesn't yet expose a JSON endpoint I can fetch automatically, so for now their map layer shows administrative boundaries only, without a count overlay. The same is true for DIME. Both will get proper data layers as their public APIs allow it — or as I find a reasonable workaround.

Further reading & related programmes

More on the PAS programme and the debates around it: the Annual Reports and the literature below.

  • 2009 Thomas, S. and Stone, P.G. (eds.) Metal Detecting and Archaeology. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
  • 2010 Worrell, S., Egan, G., Naylor, J., Leahy, K. & Lewis, M. A Decade of Discovery: Proceedings of the Portable Antiquities Scheme Conference 2007. BAR Brit. Ser. 520. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • 2010 Gill, D.W.J. The Portable Antiquities Scheme and the Treasure Act: Protecting the Archaeology of England and Wales? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 20, 1–11.
  • 2010 Compagnon, G. (Hrsg.) Halte au pillage! Arles: Errance.
  • 2013 Huth, C. Vom rechten Umgang mit Sondengänger: Das „Portable Antiquities Scheme" in England und Wales und seine Folgen. Archäologische Informationen 36, 129–137.

Interactive map

Finds by county

Toggle layers on or off. UK counties are coloured by find density; Netherlands and Denmark currently show boundaries only.

Map data may take a moment to load, especially in Firefox.

UK in detail

Late Bronze Age & Early Iron Age finds

Breakdown of the same dataset by county and by object type.

By county
By object type

Step 13 · Scheme comparison

Three countries, one period

How do the three schemes compare for the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age (1300–700 BC)? The honest answer is: we don't fully know yet. The PAS UK figure comes from live data. The PAN and DIME figures reflect total database sizes from published sources — period-specific counts comparable to the UK query are not yet publicly queryable from either scheme. This gap is itself a research finding.

🇬🇧
PAS UK
British Museum
Live data
LBA & EIA finds
1300–700 BC
  • Founded 1997
  • 1.6M+ total records (Apr 2023)
  • Professional Finds Liaison Officers
  • Qualitatively strong records
  • Public JSON API available
finds.org.uk →
🇳🇱
PAN
Portable Antiquities of the Netherlands
Static · 2022
~93 Bronze Age metal finds
documented to 2020
  • Founded 2016
  • 100,000+ total records (May 2022)
  • 7,000+ active detectorists
  • No public period-filtered API
  • Source: Arnoldussen et al. 2020
portable-antiquities.nl →
🇩🇰
DIME
Digitale Metaldetektorfund, Denmark
Static · 2021
30,633 All-period Danefæ finds
submitted 2021
  • Founded 2016 (portal launched 2018)
  • Liberal metal detecting model
  • Finder-driven records, museum-verified
  • Quantitatively strong records
  • Source: Nationalmuseet 2021
metaldetektorfund.dk →
Why can't we compare directly? The PAS UK figure is period-filtered (1300–700 BC, queried live). The PAN figure reflects Bronze Age metalwork specifically but is drawn from a 2020 published study, not a live query. The DIME figure is an annual total across all periods. Making these numbers directly comparable would require all three schemes to expose period-filtered public APIs — which remains an open challenge in the field.